After 8 years of struggle, ” Cabernet “The case made new progress: The Beijing Intermediate People’s Court judge for a national trademark on the mark re-evaluation committee to determine. Industry experts believe that intellectual property rights in such cases are not isolated cases of the case, such as the honored person prior to the Hainan Lan Tea Case.

Generic name or brand Determine “Cabernet,” whether one of the criteria for registration as a trademark is: “Cabernet” whether it is the common name, whether public resources industry? According to the provisions of trademark law, common name can not be registered as trade marks.

Great Wall prosecution that Cabernet is the French term “Cabernet” translated from a Wine Of a species. Changyu Related to the company stating that, “Cabernet” is the Changyu Company concocted vocabulary, pronunciation similarity can not be “Cabernet” is translated from the basis. Zhang Yugong customs official told reporters, “Cabernet” is a 1931 Renzhang Yu Wang Xu, general manager of the Company’s “Chinese and Western fusion,” “carrying, contains all” concept to get inspiration.

Registered trademark of why “is common”

Although Changyu said, “Cabernet,” the property of their special, but the market labeled “Cabernet” grapes Wine Everywhere. Changyu, said general manager Zhou Hongjiang, according to “Trademark Law” 52,53,54 provides some production now labeled “Cabernet” on the product is infringing. “We all know, has now entered the judicial process, how can we do?”

8 years why the fight game

Fighting for “Cabernet,” the name behind the huge interest of the industry. Insiders said, “Cabernet” on Sell 3 billion, the manufacturer has put its promotional costs, once registered by Changyu successful, then re-train the new brand will be no small cost.

Zhangyu general manager Zhou Hongjiang that, once the “Cabernet” not as a trademark of Changyu, the impact on the Changyu is enormous. “Because there are well-known among consumers, now have foreign grapes Wine Cabernet business use, this is sad. “

“Cabernet” trademark or revoked

Hainan University School of Law Associate Professor Zhang Lina that the law is to safeguard the public interest as the starting point, to protect private rights, it is necessary to protect the public interest as the premise, which is the core of the intellectual property system. If Changyu successful “Cabernet” trademark, other companies are only two ways: First, stop using the “Cabernet” name, which means that these companies early on, “Cabernet” propaganda put all in vain; 2 other companies pay to the Changyu, which will increase certain expenditures of these enterprises. In addition, if Changyu monopoly “Cabernet” or will cause the price high.

Therefore, Zhang Lina that the outcome of the case may be, “Cabernet” trademark has been canceled, and degradation for the common name. Zhang Lina said, intellectual property rights in such cases are not isolated cases of the case. If the case before the Hainan Lan and elegant tea, “Lan honored person” is an enterprise registered trademark of Hainan, was also used to name the other companies to court. Lastly, the Court held “blue and elegant” is the common name, trademark has been canceled.

It may be hard to believe but this is our first bargain wine from South Africa, one very major wine country. The Nederburg winery was founded in 1791 near Paarl not far from the Cape of Good Hope. This wine is part of their series, the Winemaker’s Reserve. This wine is marketed by Stellenbosch Farmers Winery which is not your little farmer’s winery. Stellenbosch markets about one third of all South African wines with a value of over one third of a billion dollars. I don’t think that I have to tell you about the Cabernet Sauvignon grape, one popular red grape in Bordeaux France, California, and many other locales as well. Let’s see if we can get a bargain. It seems like a fairly long time.

OUR WINE REVIEW POLICY All wines that we taste and review are purchased at the full retail price.

Wine Reviewed Nederburg Cabernet Sauvignon 2007 12.5 % alcohol about $ 9

Let’s start with the marketing materials. Tasting Note: Medium – deep red/purple; aromas of game, sweet cherry, cassis, earth, liquorice and cedar tones; dry, medium-full bodied, red currant and spice flavors with soft tannins to finish. Serving Suggestion: Grilled or roasted meats, white meats, pizza or pasta or old cheese. And now for my review.

I started by sipping this wine alone. It was oaky with tobacco, long, and presented round tannins. But seemed a bit too acidic. The first meal included a commercially barbecued chicken and potato salad. The Cab displayed plummy and earthy notes. It was more forceful with the chicken than it was with the potato salad.

The second meal centered around slow-cooked beef ribs with potatoes accompanied by a lime and garlic tomato salsa. The wine was powerful, mouth filling, and long. I got tobacco and dark fruit. This Cab was chewy. With the somewhat spicy salsa the wine became peppery and didn’t lose its force.

The final meal consisted of a packaged baked Ziti Siciliano with eggplant covered with grated Parmesan cheese. There was a fine balance of acidity, tannins, and fruit with a faint bit of tobacco.

I finished the tasting with two cheeses. The first cheese was a Yellow Cheddar. This wine was round, oaky, and it displayed good fruit. The second pairing was with a Swiss (Emmenthal). Things worked out about the same but the wine was more acidic.

Final verdict. I would definitely buy this wine again. This really struck me as somewhat of a bargain. If you’re a big fan of Cabernet Sauvignon, you might take it up a notch with Nederburg’s Manor House line. I prefer staying in their bargain price range but trying another grape.